Last week Craig Martin led a tree and shrub identification walk for PEEC
around Kinnikinnick (yes, I had to look up the spelling) Park
in Los Alamos.
It was a very welcome addition to the summer flower walks that Craig and
Chick Keller have led in the past. Nothing wrong with flowers, but I get
curious about the non-flowering plants I see around me. I guess I'm
not the only one who feels that way, because the walk was very well
attended despite the mud and snow.
And it was fabulous. I scribbled notes as I could, but I'm sure they
won't make any sense to me a week from now, let alone a year.
Hence this writeup.
Read more ...
Tags: plants, nature
[
12:34 Feb 02, 2024
More nature |
permalink to this entry |
]
The street for a substantial radius around my mailbox has a wonderful,
strong minty smell.
The smell is coming from a clump of modest little yellow flowers.
They're apparently Dyssodia papposa, whose common name is "fetid marigold".
It's in the sunflower family, Asteraceae, not related to Lamiaceae, the mints.
"Fetid", of course, means "Having an offensive smell; stinking".
When I google for fetid marigold, I find quotes like
"This plant is so abundant, and exhales an odor so unpleasant as to
sicken the traveler over the western prairies of Illinois, in
autumn." And nobody says it smells like mint -- at least, googling
for the plant and "mint" or "minty" gets nothing.
But Dave and I both find the smell very minty and pleasant,
and so do most of the other local people I queried.
What's going on?
Another local plant which turns strikingly red in autumn has an even
worse name: fetid goosefoot. On a recent hike, several of us made a
point of smelling it. Sure enough: everybody except one found it
minty and pleasant. But one person on the hike said "Eeeeew!"
It's amazing how people's sensory perception can vary. Everybody knows
how people's taste varies: some people perceive broccoli and cabbage
as bitter while others love the taste. Some people can't taste lobster
and crab at all and find Parmesan cheese unpleasant.
And then there's color vision.
Every amateur astronomer who's worked public star parties knows about
Albireo. Also known as beta Cygni, Albireo is a double star, the head
of the constellation of the swan or the foot of the Northern Cross.
In a telescope, it's a double star, and a special type of double:
what's known as a "color double", two stars which are very different
colors from each other.
Most non-astronomers probably don't think of stars having colors.
Mostly, color isn't obvious when you're looking at things at night:
you're using your rods, the cells in your retina that are sensitive
to dim light, not your cones, which provide color vision but need
a fair amount of light to work right.
But when you have two things right next to each other that are
different colors, the contrast becomes more obvious. Sort of.
Point a telescope at Albireo at a public star party and ask the
next ten people what two colors they see. You'll get at least six,
more likely eight, different answers. I've heard blue and red, blue
and gold, red and gold, red and white, pink and blue ... and white
and white (some people can't see the colors at all).
Officially, the bright component is actually a close binary, too close
to resolve as separate stars. The components are
Aa (magnitude 3.18, spectral type K2II) and
Ac (magnitude 5.82, spectral type B8).
(There doesn't seem to be an Albireo Ab.)
Officially that makes Albireo A's combined color yellow or amber.
The dimmer component, Albireo B, is magnitude 5.09 and spectral
type B8Ve: officially it's blue.
But that doesn't make the rest of the observers wrong. Color vision is
a funny thing, and it's a lot more individual than most people think.
Especially in dim light, at the limits of perception.
I'm sure I'll continue to ask that question when I show Albireo
in my telescope, fascinated with the range of answers.
In case you're wondering,
I see Albireo's components as salmon-pink and pale blue.
I enjoy broccoli and lobster but find bell peppers bitter.
And I love the minty smell of plants that a few people, apparently,
find "fetid".
Tags: nature, plants, astronomy, perception
[
16:09 Sep 21, 2015
More nature |
permalink to this entry |
]
I've been having fun wandering the yard looking at piñon cones.
We went all last summer without seeing cones on any of our trees,
which seemed very mysterious ... though the book I found on piñon pines
said they follow a three-year cycle. This year, nearly all of our trees
have little yellow-green cones developing.
A few of the trees look like most of our piñons last year: long
spikes but no cones developing on any of them.
I don't know if it's a difference in the weather this year, or that
three-year cycle I read about in the book. I also see on the web
that there's a 2-7 year interval between good piñon crops,
so clearly there are other factors.
It's going to be fun to see them develop, and to monitor them over
the next several years. Maybe we'll actually
get some piñon nuts eventually (or piñon jays to steal the nuts).
I don't know if baby cones now means nuts later this summer, or
not until next summer. Time to check that book out of the library
again ...
Tags: nature, plants, pinon, weeds
[
15:20 Jun 02, 2015
More nature |
permalink to this entry |
]